Catastro - Registro - Lindes

Neighbours. Always neighbours. Even if you move to the Spanish countryside you have neighbours. This time it's about a measly strip of land that was retained 20 years ago by the family that sold the property, but probably did not register the changes too well. Now we want a fence, and there’s.. discussion.

The Trespassers

People cross our land. On foot, on motorbike and by car, even though the passages that are not passages are blocked with stones, to make sure people don't take them for passages. Still they do think they are passages. We even had a moron moving the stones along the road and park his camper van there. Enough. Or "basta" as a certain royal said. This is now a garden, there are newly planted trees there, and watering hoses, etc. that we want to keep intact, thank you very much. So, a fence.

Hey, and don't we have a no-entry sign at the entry...?

The Fence and the borders

Along with the work on the cellar a fence was installed, along the boundaries as the catastro shows us, but a bit inset onto our land as to not offend the neighbours, and leave  access to the irrigation water taps and canals. Also, we left a wide opening to be closed with a chain, so it could be opened in case of trouble with the road, and people could pass by our land. Which is very nice of us.

Well, they were still putting up the poles when neighbour number one showed up, being warned by the irrigation water guy. 

"Is there a problem?

"Si, problema muy gordo" (big problem)

We pointed at the catastro map, but that was indignantly shoved aside. 

"No no no, catastro does not mean anything in Spain, here the land registry (registro) is the authority". 

And, "These borders were agreed by the owners in the past, and defined by putting a big stone "mojón" on the border", pointing at (mind the possible date "18-1-63"):

And:

They indeed ploughed up to the line between these stones.  Well, the block with the possible date looks just like the ones the electricity company uses to put up poles, the other is a loose simple block. (I needed a block a few weeks ago, lucky I did not touch it!)

The Discussions

Phone call from the actual owner, well, her son. 

"So you are building a fence, I am going to denounce you and get a judicial procedure to sue you."

"Well, maybe we can talk about it, we can show you the catastro map, and what we have done." 

He was there in five minutes. 

"This is theft! It is like me going into your house and steal something!"

"Well sorry, sorry, we will solve this. If we are wrong about the border "linde" in Spanish we will move the fence. Another option would be to buy the land, if you are willing to sell?"

"Yes, for 15.000€ we will sell! *wraah*"

That is quite ridiculous for 610 m2 agricultural land, so we again said to him, "well the catastro show this..."

"No no no, catastro means nothing, the registro is the authority!"

"Well, we have the registro data for our property too, it's in our deed, I will fetch it, do you have your deed too?"  (He said yes, but did not show it.)

Fetched our Escritura papers. Catastro: 5579 m2  Registro:  5540 m2. A deviation of 10% maximum is allowed, here it is less than 1%. 

Side note: The property we are discussing is in between the road and our land, so there simply is not more land than is present on the ground.  If the registro and catastro agree on the surface of our property that means the catastro measurements of that other plot must be correct, whatever the registro says about that other plot.  

Here is that catastro ortofoto situation, blue lines around our land:

You can see that they have used (ploughed and planted) up to the green arrow line, while only the bit with the red arrow is theirs. 

The owners's son said: I will call a technico, and he will explain to you the borders, and the catastro and the registro. Well, alright. He went away, and we continued work on the rain water drains. 

The Police

Not less than 30 minutes later the local police showed up. 

"What are all these works here then?!" 

"What with all these stones?!" (that had been there two years already)

"Ah, are you here about that fence, that we just discussed with sr. <asshole's name>?"

He sort of nodded, and did not like that we noted that he was sent/called by this ...

"You need to declare all works at the town hall!"

"But, this is a private road and land"

"No matter, you need to tell the town hall every work on your house" (not true)

"Even if painting a wall?"

"Yes, hmm, painting maybe not, but you need to declare works at the town hall"

"But we did" (we did, using an official communication web form with citizen's digital certificate and all  that they did not reply to)

"Yes, I already have an appointment the day after tomorrow" (I had)

"Hm"

"..." (silence, them slightly embarrassed)

"How are things with the [mad] neighbour?"

"All quiet, and he likes these rain water drains!"

They left, almost friendly again.

The Technico

Next day the owner was back, with a sunglassed gring...guy in a suit.

"Are you from the Registro in Vera?", I asked

"No, I'm a technico, an architect."

I looked (very) disappointed and said "oh".

Side note: in normal countries the cadastre is an esteemed institute with authority, recording land ownership, borders, mortgages, etc.  In Spain they have two bodies registering land. In Spain the "registro" is the actual authority on borders and area, the "catastro" is set up by the tax office, with main purpose the collection of taxes on land. Although today the registro and catastro are supposed to become more and more the same, there still are lots of discrepancies. If there is a difference of more than 10% in land surface they by law need to correct the registers.

The technico waved in front of us a sheet of paper with the image above, with an extra line drawn in at the green arrow. Then pointed at that, solemnly stating "REGISTRO". Then pointed at the blue line, stating "CATASTRO", and back to "REGISTRO", implying the bigger plot was theirs, and we would not understand if he used more words. How impressed we were.

I told him I was aware that the Registro registers the land and the Catastro is for the Hacienda, mainly set up for collecting taxes. 

He nodded a big "YES".

"So, we seem to be paying the tax for their land?"

Shocked silence behind the sunglasses.

He then brusquely turned around and left, slamming his car door, obviously offended by this cheeky foreigner.

His story obviously was intended as bluff. There can be differences, but not as big as here. The land they used is more than 850 m2, and not the 610 m2 it is. (The A.H. owner is an A.H.)

We were left with the owner (the son) and discussed that we can move the fence to the actual border, if not correct. Or, another option would be to buy the land, so the location of the fence would be a non issue. He thought that a good idea too, and could we make an offer? We mentioned an amount that per m2 is a bit more than we paid for another bit of land. He would discuss this with his family and left. 

The Nota Simple

Well, if the registro is the authority, we will request the Nota Simple for the land, and then we will discuss what to do. 

The "Nota Simple" is an extract from the registro that you can request if you have the name and personal number ("NIE") of the owner. That information is always listed in the catastro data, and is public. And, you need a Nota Simple when you want to buy a property, or if you need to know the actual borders. Off to the registro.

"No, we have two land registries for this man, one of 9000 m2 and one of 6000 m2, but those are not this plot".

Odd. Well, if they cannot find the register for the name and NIE, then you need the land registry number "Numero finca registral". We asked the owner for this number four times. 

"yes, this week I'm away, next week"

"I will get it to you on Monday"

"Yes yes"

(Nothing)

In the last message we received he sent a catastro(!) map. Could this be an implicit acknowledgement that he now also agrees the catastro is correct...? 

I sent him (all this is by WhatsApp) a note that he sent not Registro data but a Catastro map, and if he could be so kind as to send us the finca number. Nothing.

The Catastro historic maps

Our town hall is also a "Punto Información Catastral". I went there to ask about the borders, and whether they knew the actual and official border, or even the finca number. No, but he could give me an up-to-date list of our neighbours, complete with land area, name and NIE. You get such a list in your deed when you buy a property, but of course things change. The owner of the property had not changed.  Well, actually he died, but the catastro does not know that if you don't tell them.

The official did tell me that the owner of the plot had been there too, with the same request for information. That is strange, why would he...? Perhaps he is not the owner, or lost his papers..?

He clicked around in the catastro computer interface before my eyes, to show how the maps were in the past, and I noticed the boundaries were different, back then! That is interesting! Can you print them for me please, year by year? It was his pleasure. Below are the results.

2001

Notice that in 2001 the house (pink bit) was not part of the property no. 299 on the right, it was part of the property on the left, no. 298, that we own, too. And, the 610 m2 strip of land was still part of plot no. 299! The significance of this is that it was not our fathers fathers fathers who agreed a border, with a mojón stone dated 18-1-63 to prove the deal for all posterity, but that this split off is actually very recent: it happened between 2001 and 2003, see below.

2003

In 2003 we see the strip of land having been split off of plot 299, retaining as the plot number 299, while old plot no. 299 now is a new plot no. 338. The house still is part of plot no. 298. This also means the split happened before the house was sold to the previous owners, who said the split was a surprise to them. (...)

2006

In 2006 the house is still not part of plot no. 338 as it is today, although that must be an error, as the house was sold to the previous owners in 2005, and it must have been part of 338 then. Unknown what 003 and 9028 mean in the pink bit (house).

2007

In 2007 the house now has been split off of plot no. 298, and has become part of plot no. 338. This has lead to errors in the Registro information of plot 298, as one of the boundaries ("lindes") is described as "camino", while the plot no longer has a road as a border. Also the surface area is wrong, 2420 m2, while it actually is 2180 m2. It indeed was 2420 m2 in the past, when the house was still part of it. 

The problem with the registro probably is that records of neighbouring properties are not linked, while in the catastro they are. Change one border in the catastro, and the border of the neighbour changes too, automatically. Not in the registro. So, we have wrong borders, wrong area, and an outdated list of neighbours there.

If the previous owner had read his deed carefully he might have claimed the land up to the road, including the house? Well, as they rrreally think here that the registro is always correct.. 

There is another clue that the house changed plot number: there is a clause in the registro information of plot 338 (the property with the house) about the use of the "salto de agua", "the waterfall", as is present in the property. They are referring to the construction where the water for the mill dropped 5-6 meters, in our lower cellar, and was used to drive the flour production.

That same clause still is present in the deed for plot no. 298, that no longer contains the house, nor the salto de agua. They simply forgot to delete this clause when the house was taken out, and the salto de agua no longer is present in this plot. Another registro error, but very informative for engineer Jansen.

2008

No significant changes in 2008

2020

2020, the current situation. The garage/terrace is now detected, and they even list our pool! Though not our balsa. Odd. But, mistakes are made.

The Lawyer

We were tired of waiting for the finca number, so we asked our lawyer to contact the owner's son and put on some pressure. Again his reply: "yes yes, next week". 

But, again: nothing.

Went to talk with our lawyer. With 3 suggestions of followup letters.

1. "we assume that you, by sending the catastro map, acknowledge that the borders therein are correct. Please let us know within one week if you disagree, else we will finish the fence, and any costs in later changes are for you.”

2. “Citizens have the right to know the borders of their land, and you are obstructing that right. To solve this we could start a demarcation procedure (“deslinde”),  and as you are obstructing our current efforts any costs involved are for you”

3. Yet another option: the registro can not find the land for the name and NIF that the catastro tells us.  This may very well be an error or issue at the registro. Can we (strongly) ask the registro to put in effort to solve this? They are responsible for proper keeping of records, they cannot let a member of the public in doubt without helping them further. 

Our lawyer did not like these options, and said, "well, if the registro and catastro agree on the size of your land, then you should just finish your fence and see what happens. Probably the land is not registered at all, to save costs." 

Side note: If the registro and catastro agree on the area of a property that is very good (for us).  The property we are discussing is in between the road and our land, so there simply is not more land than is present on the ground.

The lawyer said: "if there is a dispute the court will first order a land measurement procedure.  My sister is a land meter! She has this GPS device, it costs about €800 for a property of 5500 m2 like yours." 

"Hm."  (this is a grmbl hm)

"Can we not measure his land? That's only 600 m2". 

"No, you cannot measure other people's land".

"By the way: he said that if you make a door on his side, he will denounce you."

"Did he really say that?"

"Yes."

"What a nasty person."

Ah, what he means is the opening in the fence we intended to close with a chain, and open in case there is trouble with the road, so traffic can be diverted across our land. He thinks it is something we want to use, but it was not intended to be used by us, but for the neighbours in case of problems. We will now close the fence entirely, then. No problem for us.

Our lawyer thinks he is again bluffing, and all he wants is to make money out of a sale. Well, tough. We’re not interested in buying any more.

The Land Measurements

Engineer Jansen is not of yesterday, as the Dutch say, and he has Google Earth Pro on his computer: an application on the desktop that offers some more features than regular Google Maps via a web browser. One of its features is that you can draw lines and polygons, and thus measure distances and areas. That works very well, and is actually very precise. No need for a lawyer's sister and her GPS. 

Here are the results. (click for full size)

(click to view full size) 5530 m2 (Catastro: 5579 m2  Registro:  5540 m2)

(click to view full size) 611 m2 (Catastro: 618 m2)

To engineer Jansen this means the catastro measurements are correct, and the fence can be finished.

Oh, we also had a reply to our offer for buying the land: 

"my parents think the situation of this land is very strategic for your finca, as it offers a great access to the public road, which is very beneficial for you", and doubled our offer as the price they want. 

Well, we have a far better access to the public road at the back of our land, so he can stuff it. We are going to finish the fence. If he shows up again I'll let you know.

PS

Did I say we think the owner's son is an asshole? I may have forgotten to mention it.

 

Nice drawing tool from China

 I've had some problems with buying things online. Usually it's DHL that lies it has been at your house, but hasn't, has informed recipient of the status of the parcel but hasn't, and then drops off the parcel at some collection point, 20 minutes away by car, after (not) informing the recipient. 

But today we're discussing ordering something from China. Well, I did not know I was ordering from China, as I thought I was dealing with someone in the US having crafted a nice drawing tool for circles:

A nifty brass ring with an inox diaphragm for drawing circles. US$18 if I remember correctly, all in all €20.

No I did not really need a circle drawing tool, but hey, it was nearly Christmas, and I thought it a nifty thing and a nice present. 

After a few weeks, after christmas actually this is what I received:

Yes, that nasty fluorescent green plastic thing. No nifty brass diaphragm. Oh dear. 

Did I pay €20 for a piece of shit plastic worth 50 cents? Apparently I did.

A mail sent to the email address of the seller did not result in a reply, but Paypal has some stronger ways to communicate with unwilling sellers. 

"We are very sorry, but the plastic tool you received is what we sell"

Ah. Ok. Well, I'm not happy, and this is not what I expected, given the advertisement. Oh, that Facebook advert was now gone, but I could rescue image above from the cache.

"We are sorry that you are not happy, you can return the item to our warehouse in China, which is very costly for you, and maybe it is advisable to accept a refund of 30% ?"

No it is not. Please refund the whole amount.

"We are sorry that you are not happy, you can return the item to our warehouse in China, which is very costly for you, and maybe it is advisable to accept a refund of 50% ?"

No it is not. Please refund the whole amount, or I will have Paypal spank you.

"We are sorry that you are not happy, you can return the item to our warehouse in China, which is very costly for you, and maybe it is advisable to accept a refund of 70% ?"

No it is not. Paypal, please engage. Paypal answered that I needed to return the goods to the seller, with tracking, and they would refund 100%. I needed to pay for the return though.

Returning the thing was €8. Financially it would have been more advantageous for me to accept the 70% offer, but it would mean they still made a profit of 30%, and I did not want them to earn a single penny. Bloody scammers!

The tracking worked up to Shenzen, where it was out for delivery at some point in time, then vanished from the track record. Hmm.

But Paypal refunded the whole amount immediately when that happened.

The moral is: check beforehand if you are buying from China, and if so don't. And, pay with Paypal, to be able to get your money back from scammers.

China needs to lose its status as an upcoming economy, they can send parcels around the world at hardly any cost. And they need to update their morals.

Bread again again again: a machine, or not

In these corona troubled times we (I) also starting baking bread, as you know. Yes you do. Last time I bored you with no-knead bread , but it turns out that we like regular rolls better than a loaf you need to cut. 2kg flour for 20 rolls (we bought 5 packs of 5kg at Mercadona) :

2kg flour and 1080 ml water is quite some dough, and the poor handmixer I use for the initial mix can barely handle it. It starts creaking and groaning very quickly,  so engineer Jansen's hands need to finish the work. Then it needs proper kneading. You should knead for 15 minutes, twice, but that is asking quite a lot of the kneader. So, the engineer starts creaking and groaning, too. 

Kitchenaid

Being an engineer a machine popped up in the brain quite quickly. After some searching around the internets concensus is that a Kitchenaid 6.9 liter Artisan with its powerful DC motor and planetary movement is the machine for making bread.

Who am I to disagree, with this "liebesapfelrot" beauty?

And no, it is not cheap, but they say it lasts forever, completely made of metal, unlike my poor plastic handmixer.

Ordered it online, there are no shops with this here. €750. Hm, yeah. Well.

There are two versions, technically identical, but different warranty conditions: 5KSM7580 and 5KSM7591. The 7580 series has a warranty of 5 years, and is intended for domestic use, the 7591 series is for professional use, and has a warranty of 1 year. Ordered the 5KSM7580XECA.

It arrived. On the serial number plate it says "ASSEMBLED IN USA", which was sort of a relief to engineer Jansen: at least not assembled in China.

Actually it is a very dangerous machine! Look:

And operation is both complicated and dangerous. Every time you want to add ingredients you need to switch off the "multi-fuction kitchen robot" completely, remove the plug from the socket, ...

Anyway, the engineer managed to get it unpacked and connected. First 1 kg flour. Oh, that's quite a lot actually, will it fit..? But after adding the water it shrinks and fits. Add another kilo and water. 

Click!

Hm, what is all that noise?

Click click! clicketeclick! Click! Click! This is not really to engineer Jansen's liking. It's not the connection of the dough hook to the axle, it really is some play in the gears of the machine:

Engineer Jansen rreally does not like that, clicking and thumping means that gears bump into each other, which means: wear and tear. And maybe there is 5 year warranty, but I don't want to have to repair a machine after 5 years either.

There are a lot of web pages about the clicking noise. Many machines do have the sound, but many are totally quiet! Some people think it is the connection between dough hook and the axle (it's not):

http://www.thefreshloaf.com/node/50550/does-your-kitchenaid-proline-7-qt-mixer-click-under-heavy-loads

They exchanged the machine there, and got one that does not click.

This machine is quiet:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFMXtuUtM3w&feature=share

 

Asked Kitchenaid online, via Facebook, and got this reply: 

"The clicking sound is not normal and we advised you to exchange it indeed. 

As for the movement of the planetary part, it's completely normal and it has no effect on the appliance's performance whatsoever, nor will it affect it in the future. The only issue with your machine is the clicking sound for which we confirmed is not normal."

Back to the shop. 

"The machine we have here in the showroom makes the same noise, so it is normal"

But, if I insisted they would be willing to exchange it for another machine. Tried another round of dough making, but the noise did not go away, so what to do. If this is a serial fault, exchanging it for another machine will not help. It may be better to send it off to Kitchenaid and have it repaired, so I'd be certain I'll have a machine that I like. 

Asked that Kitchenaid. Also, if they are so sure a certain clicking is normal, would they be willing to extend the warranty for that specific problem beyond 5 years? Alas, the online Kitchenaid people have no authority in Spain, so I needed to call Kitchenaid service in Barcelona and discuss. Grmbl.

I don't feel like sending a brand new machine off for repairs that I don't know the outcome of.

And, the shop now said: a new machine will make the same noise, so we will not exchange it. But, you can send it back and get a refund. So I did that. 

Packing up this machine is not simple, and I had not done an unboxing video, but we managed.

The machine was picked up, after reminding them only twice, and a refund was promised. 

It took a few times reminding them of that too, but eventually we had the money back. Pfew.

And, maybe the Kitchenaid is not assembled in China, but the parts used may be from there. Where is your quality control, Kitchenaid? Someone mentioned the professional 79 series (only 1 year warranty vs 5 years) never has this clicking, so it is/seems possible to produce a trouble-free machine.  However, as a single customer I cannot find that out.

But, now being machineless it's back to the kneading board. 

Bosch

A friend suggested this Bosch:

Bleah. I like Bosch, but this is silly. And it's a huge machine.

Planetenruhrmaschine

Or this one for €350? A lot cheaper than the Kitchenaid! And it looks like it can mix planets, indeed.

 https://www.ggmgastro.com/gb/planetenruehrmaschine-10-liter.html

Ankarsrum 

The Swedish Ankarsrum? (€550) For extensions you turn the machine on its side!

https://www.ankarsrumoriginalusa.com

hm.